Chapter Criticizing Mencius

Wang ChongNanhai Publication Company · ChinaJun 2024

4.4

Word count: 4.8K words
Chapters: 2

Report an error Find this book

Summary

This chapter is Wang Chong's critique of Mencius, hence the title “Stabbing Mencius.”

Editor's review

“Stabbing Mencius” is the chapter in Wang Chong's Balanced Inquiries (Lunheng) devoted to a concentrated critique of Mencius, and its title makes the writing's target clear. Its value for readers lies not in offering a complete assessment of Mencius but in showing how an Eastern Han thinker treated classics and sages regarded as authorities—with a posture of doubt. Wang Chong examines Mencius's statements and conduct point by point, identifying contradictions and dubious elements; this mode of “stabbing” is itself a demonstration of a method of thinking. Readers who take it as a definitive negation of Mencius will misread it; a better approach is to see it as an argument with a stance, noting which points Wang Chong selects, by what standards he judges right and wrong, and what gaps he leaves in his rebuttals. The chapter involves analysis of specific sayings and deeds of Mencius, requiring some familiarity with the Mencius text; otherwise it is hard to judge the focus of the exchange. It is suitable as a sample for understanding the Han-era tendency to question classics and critical writing.

Who it's for

A good fit for

Readers interested in Balanced Inquiries and Wang Chong's thought
Those who have read Mencius and want to learn about ancient criticisms
Researchers concerned with the Han-era tendency to question classics and critical writing
Readers who enjoy watching ancient intellectual debates and are willing to think about argumentation

Not a good fit for

Beginners who have not yet encountered Mencius and lack textual grounding
Readers seeking a systematic introduction to Mencius's thought rather than criticism
Readers prone to taking one critic's words directly as a final verdict

Reading tips

Review the relevant passages of Mencius first, then read this chapter, to see the focus of the exchange clearly.
While reading, distinguish Wang Chong's paraphrase from Mencius's original text and note any simplification or taking out of context.
For each paragraph, first summarize the basis of Wang Chong's criticism, then ask yourself whether that basis holds.
After finishing, read an ancient text defending Mencius alongside it to appreciate the divergence between the two sides.

About the publisher

Nanhai Publication Company China · Founded in 1988

Nanhai Publication Company is a comprehensive publisher known for its literature and arts titles, covering fields such as classical poetry, martial arts fiction, and folk literature. Judging from the more than 1,600 books in the database, the company has released classical poetic works including the Nineteen Old Poems and the Nine Songs, as well as multiple volumes of Huanzhulouzhu's series The Swordsmen of Mount Shu, along with related writings by authors such as Guan Hanqing, Qu Yuan, Zuo Si, and Wang Zhihuan. Its publishing character lies in balancing the organization of classic texts with the dissemination of popular literature, placing poetry anthologies alongside long martial arts novels and presenting a relatively diverse literary profile. Public information is limited, and further details about its editorial practices and series planning remain to be supplemented.

版权信息
卷十

FAQ

Is “Stabbing Mencius” a standalone book?

No, it is a chapter in Wang Chong's Balanced Inquiries, not a standalone work. The title “Stabbing Mencius” means criticism of Mencius, and the content centers on doubts about Mencius's statements and conduct. It should be read within the overall “attacking falsehoods” tendency of Balanced Inquiries, not as a complete monograph on Mencius.

Does Wang Chong fully negate Mencius in this chapter?

Judging from the title and the manner of writing, Wang Chong raises doubts about specific statements and conduct of Mencius; this is selective criticism, not an overall, total negation of Mencius. Readers should not read every criticism in the chapter as a final verdict on Mencius, but should attend to the angles of his questioning and the grounds of his arguments.

Must one be thoroughly familiar with Mencius before reading this chapter?

Not thoroughly, but one should at least understand the relevant passages involved; otherwise it is hard to judge whether Wang Chong's paraphrase is accurate and whether the criticism hits the mark. If you have had no contact with Mencius at all, it is advisable first to read a selected edition or the plain text and annotations of the relevant chapters, then enter the argumentative context of this chapter.

What use is this text to today's readers?

Its main use is to model an attitude toward authoritative texts: not giving up inquiry because the object is a sage, but examining point by point whether statements are self-consistent. Readers can use it to practice analyzing arguments and distinguishing paraphrase from original text, but should also note the limits of Wang Chong's own stance and avoid taking the critical posture itself as a conclusion.

Related on WeRead

Comments

Find this book

This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.

About the author

Wang Chong Author · Chinese

Wang Chong (27–c. 97), courtesy name Zhongren, was a native of Shangyu in Kuaiji (present-day Shaoxing, Zhejiang). A thinker, literary critic, and atheist of the Eastern Han, he entered the Imperial Academy in Luoyang in his youth and studied under Ban Biao; later he left office, stayed at home, and devoted himself to writing. His representative work, the eighty-five-chapter Lunheng (Balanced Inquiries), criticizes Chenwei superstition and the theory of interactions between Heaven and humanity, advocates a naturalist theory of qi, and stands as an important representative of Han-dynasty materialist thought. Wang Chong valued evidence and analysis in his writing, often developing arguments through questions and debates in a plain but sharp style. The collection holds sixty-nine of his works, including such pieces as Shizhi pian, Wenkong pian, Ziran pian, Daoxu pian, Duizuo pian, and Hanwen pian, covering philosophy, social criticism, and literary appreciation. He championed independent thinking and opposed blind submission to authority, exerting a lasting influence on later thought and literary criticism.