Exempting the Churches

Morton, James F. (James Ferdinand), 1870-1941Project Gutenberg · United StatesDec 2019

2.9

Word count: 165K words
Chapters: 17

Summary

Project Gutenberg was the first provider of free electronic books, or eBooks. Michael Hart, founder of Project Gutenberg, invented eBooks in 1971 and his memory continues to inspire the creation of eBooks and related technologies today.Exempting the Churches by James F. MortonAuthor: Morton, James F. (James Ferdinand), 1870-1941,Language: English, Class: BV: Philosophy, Psychology, Religion: Christianity: Practical theology, Worship, Release Date: Dec 22, 2011

Editor's review

James F. Morton's Exempting the Churches is a polemical tract on whether religious bodies should enjoy tax exemption—an old issue at the intersection of church-state relations and public finance. Its value lies not in offering a neutral survey but in presenting a clear position and mode of argument: the author challenges the reasonableness of special treatment for churches on principle, in direct language with a strong controversial edge. As a public-domain e-book, it is short and well suited for use as discussion material, offering a look at the rhetoric and logic of early twentieth-century American debates on the subject. Readers should note that it is a pamphlet of a particular stance, not a balanced scholarly study; facts and institutional context should be checked before citation. For readers studying religion and law or disputes over tax fairness, it serves as a primary polemical sample; general readers are better advised to read it quickly and critically, identifying its presuppositions and leaps of inference rather than accepting it as a conclusive argument.

Who it's for

A good fit for

Readers studying church-state relations and debates over religious tax exemption
Those interested in fairness in public finance who are willing to read polemical texts
Teachers and students needing primary polemical material for classroom discussion
Readers accustomed to critical reading who can distinguish stance from argument

Not a good fit for

Readers seeking a neutral survey or an explanation of current tax law
Those wanting a systematic theology or a general treatment of religious institutions
General readers sensitive to polemical style who expect calm exposition

Reading tips

First establish the period and institutional context, then determine what specific arrangement the author is addressing.
As you read, mark the author's core premises and inferences, distinguishing factual claims from value judgments.
Read alongside a neutral survey to avoid accepting only one side of the argument.
After reading, list two points you agree with and two you disagree with, to practice evaluating polemical texts.

About the publisher

Project Gutenberg United States · Founded in 1971

Project Gutenberg is a digital publishing project focused on public-domain ebooks. Its publishing direction centers on classic literary works whose copyright has expired, covering genres such as poetry, drama, fiction, and epic. Representative books include Lyrical Ballads by Wordsworth and Coleridge, Proust's Du côté de chez Swann, Shakespeare's Macbeth and The Complete Works of William Shakespeare, Homer's The Iliad, Dante's La Divina Comèdia: Purgatòri, Cervantes's The History of Don Quixote, Volume 2, and Grahame's The Wind in the Willows. Its author resources consist mainly of classic Western writers such as Wordsworth, Proust, Shakespeare, Homer, Dante, Cervantes, Grahame, and Tolstoy. Its publishing feature is the provision of freely accessible ebooks in EPUB and Kindle formats; it is not a traditional publisher, and publicly available information is limited.

FAQ

Is this text a scholarly study or a polemical pamphlet?

In genre and tone it is closer to sharply positioned polemic than to a balanced scholarly survey. The author has a clear position, the argument proceeds on principle, and citations and materials serve the argument. It should be read as a primary polemical sample, not a conclusive study; institutional facts should be verified separately.

Can I read it without knowing about the U.S. tax system?

You can, but some background is needed. The exemption arrangements discussed relate to the institutional environment of the time; without any familiarity, it is easy to mistake the specific practices the author targets for universal conditions. It is advisable to look up the basic framework of tax exemption for religious bodies in that period before reading, which will make the text easier to understand.

Is it suitable for classroom discussion?

It works well as short discussion material because its position is clear and its length manageable, making it easy for students to identify premises, inferences, and rhetoric. Teachers should provide opposing viewpoints or neutral background material alongside it, guiding students to distinguish factual claims from value judgments and to avoid taking a one-sided polemic as the complete picture.

Comments

Find this book

This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.

About the author

Morton, James F. (James Ferdinand), 1870-1941 Author · American · 1870–1941

James F. Morton (1870–1941) was an American naturalist and freethought writer who served as curator of the Paterson Museum. Public information about his life and scholarly career is limited, and the only work currently confirmed is Exempting the Churches. Judging from that title and his background as a freethought writer, his writings centered on religious institutions, secularism, and church-state relations in public life, with a polemical tone aimed at readers concerned with civil rights and rationalism. Grounded in his training as a naturalist, he combined observation with argument in a direct style and with clear positions. Today the work is cited mainly as a historical document for the study of early American secularism and debates over the separation of church and state, and its influence lies chiefly within the freethought and secularist movements.