Bacon is Shake-Speare cover

Bacon is Shake-Speare

Rating 2.0
Word count
267K words
Chapters
27

Tags

Summary

Project Gutenberg was the first provider of free electronic books, or eBooks. Michael Hart, founder of Project Gutenberg, invented eBooks in 1971 and his memory continues to inspire the creation of eBooks and related technologies today.Bacon is Shake-Speare by Sir Edwin Durning-LawrenceAuthor: Durning-Lawrence, Edwin, Sir, 1837-1914,Language: English, Class: PR: Language and Literatures: English literature, Release Date: Feb 1, 2006

Editor's review

This book is a treatise by Sir Edwin Durning-Lawrence on the authorship of Shakespeare's works and one of the representative texts of the "Baconian" position. The author seeks internal textual clues to argue that Bacon was the true author of Shakespeare's plays, reflecting one line of thought in the English-speaking world's authorship controversy from the late nineteenth to the early twentieth century. For readers studying Shakespeare's reception history, the authorship debate, and textual scholarship, the book offers value at the level of primary sources, allowing observation of the argumentative methods and rhetorical style of the period. It should be noted that the views expressed are a hypothesis from a particular standpoint, not scholarly consensus, and should be read critically. As a public-domain e-book, it is suitable as material for academic history or supplementary topical reading, not as an introductory text.

Who it's for

A good fit for

  • Literature students and scholars studying the Shakespeare authorship controversy
  • Readers interested in the Bacon-Shakespeare hypothesis
  • Readers needing late nineteenth-century English polemical texts as research material
  • Experienced readers accustomed to English originals who care about editions and textual scholarship

Not a good fit for

  • Beginners seeking introductory knowledge of Shakespeare's life and works
  • General readers wanting authoritative conclusions and unwilling to engage with controversial hypotheses
  • Readers with limited English proficiency who need Chinese translation and annotation

Reading tips

  1. First understand the basic background of the Shakespeare authorship debate, then enter the book's specific arguments.
  2. Distinguish the author's claims from verifiable evidence while reading, and annotate inferential content.
  3. Read alongside mainstream scholarly views to form your own judgment rather than accepting everything wholesale.
  4. For the English original, use a dictionary and annotated edition, and work through the argument chain chapter by chapter.

About the publisher

Project Gutenberg United States · Founded in 1971

Project Gutenberg is a digital publishing project focused on public-domain ebooks. Its publishing direction centers on classic literary works whose copyright has expired, covering genres such as poetry, drama, fiction, and epic. Representative books include Lyrical Ballads by Wordsworth and Coleridge, Proust's Du côté de chez Swann, Shakespeare's Macbeth and The Complete Works of William Shakespeare, Homer's The Iliad, Dante's La Divina Comèdia: Purgatòri, Cervantes's The History of Don Quixote, Volume 2, and Grahame's The Wind in the Willows. Its author resources consist mainly of classic Western writers such as Wordsworth, Proust, Shakespeare, Homer, Dante, Cervantes, Grahame, and Tolstoy. Its publishing feature is the provision of freely accessible ebooks in EPUB and Kindle formats; it is not a traditional publisher, and publicly available information is limited.

Contents

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27

FAQ

Is the view in this book scholarly consensus?
No. The book represents the "Baconian" position, arguing that Bacon was the true author of Shakespeare's plays. This hypothesis is not mainstream scholarly consensus and is regarded more as one view in the history of the authorship controversy. It should be read as a polemical text from a particular historical context, not as a definitive work.
Can I read this book without any background in Shakespeare?
You can, but the threshold is relatively high. The book's argument centers on authorship attribution and involves play texts, editions, and historical background; without basic familiarity with Shakespeare's works, it is easy to lose track of the argument. Reading a few of Shakespeare's major plays and a brief biography first will make the book easier to follow.
Is this book suitable for academic citation?
It can be cited as research material, but its partisan nature should be clearly noted. The book is one of the primary documents in the authorship controversy and is suitable for discussing the controversy's historical development and argumentative methods. When citing its specific claims, consult mainstream scholarship and opposing views as well, and avoid presenting the hypothesis as established fact.

Comments

Find this book

This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.

About the author

Sir Edwin Durning-Lawrence Author · British · 1837–1914

Sir Edwin Durning-Lawrence (1837–1914) was a British politician and writer best known for arguing that Francis Bacon was the true author of Shakespeare's plays. His two works held in the collection, The Shakespeare Myth and Bacon is Shake-Speare, develop this central claim and belong to the polemical literature of the Shakespeare–Bacon authorship controversy. Such works are typically characterized by textual comparison, historical conjecture, and a combative style, aimed at readers interested in this literary dispute, and they are representative of the popular传播 of the authorship question. Public information on his education, specific public offices, and the details of his writing career is limited, so no inferences are made here; his influence lies mainly in the dissemination of the authorship controversy rather than in mainstream Shakespeare scholarship.