Questions on the Classic of Difficult Issues
Tags
Summary
Editor's review
Who it's for
A good fit for
- Chinese medicine students or enthusiasts with some foundation in the Huangdi Neijing or Shanghan Lun who wish to study the Nan Jing in depth
- Physicians engaged in clinical Chinese medicine practice seeking theoretical deepening and expansion of clinical thinking
- Researchers interested in classical Chinese medicine research methods and scholarly debate
- Advanced learners dissatisfied with textbook-style interpretation who desire a critical, reflective dialogue with the classics
Not a good fit for
- General readers with no concept of Chinese medicine who are looking for accessible books on health and wellness
- Beginners who only need to quickly grasp the outline passages of the Nan Jing for exam purposes
Reading tips
- Read through the original text of the Nan Jing at least once to gain a basic impression of its overall framework and main questions before reading this book; this will yield better results
- Keep a standard edition of the Nan Jing (such as Hua Shou's Nan Jing Ben Yi) at hand for comparison so you can consult the original text at any time
- The book is highly reflective; there is no need to finish it in one sitting—read it slowly chapter by chapter and record your own questions and insights as you go
About the publisher
Guangdong Science and Technology Press is a science and technology publisher with medicine and popular science as important areas. Judging from the 550 titles in the database, its publishing covers popular science, social culture, biography and medicine. It offers classic works of popular science and scientific humanism such as From One to Infinity, Relativity and My Worldview, as well as regional taxonomic monographs like the various volumes of the Nanling Insect Fauna, and clinical medical titles such as the Multidisciplinary Consultation on Difficult Lung Cancer Cases from the Chinese Chest Tumor Conference. The two volumes of the Color Atlas of Chinese Folk Medicinal Herbs reflect its work in organizing traditional medicine and local knowledge. Authors and translators such as George Gamow and Einstein, together with entomologists such as Yang Xingke and Yang Ding, support its characteristic balance of popular science and specialized publishing. Public information is limited; the above is summarized only from the titles in the database.
Contents
- 版权信息
- 序
- 前言 怎样读《难经》
- 脉诊篇
- 一难
- 二难
- 三难
- 四难
- 五难
- 六难
- 七难
- 八难
- 九难
- 十难
- 十一难
- 十二难
- 十三难
- 十四难
- 十五难
- 十六难
- 十七难
- 十八难
- 十九难
- 二十难
- 二十一难
- 经脉篇
- 二十二难
- 二十三难
- 二十四难
- 二十五难
- 二十六难
- 二十七难
- 二十八难
- 二十九难
- 三十难
- 脉象篇
- 三十一难
- 三十二难
- 三十三难
- 三十四难
- 三十五难
- 三十六难
- 三十七难
- 三十八难
- 三十九难
- 四十难
- 四十一难
- 四十二难
- 四十三难
- 四十四难
- 四十五难
- 四十六难
- 四十七难
- 疾病篇
- 四十八难
- 四十九难
- 五十难
- 五十一难
- 五十二难
- 五十三难
- 五十四难
- 五十五难
- 五十六难
- 五十七难
- 五十八难
- 五十九难
- 六十难
- 六十一难
- 腧穴篇
- 六十二难
- 六十三难
- 六十四难
- 六十五难
- 六十六难
- 六十七难
- 六十八难
- 针法篇
- 六十九难
- 七十难
- 七十一难
- 七十二难
- 七十三难
- 七十四难
- 七十五难
- 七十六难
- 七十七难
- 七十八难
- 七十九难
- 八十难
- 八十一难
- 十字路口叹中医
FAQ
How is this book different from other vernacular translations or lecture notes on the Nan Jing on the market?
Can someone without a foundation in Chinese medicine understand it?
What is the background of the author, Zhou Dajun? Are his views authoritative?
Comments
Find this book
This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.
About the author
Public information about Zhou Dajun is limited; all that is currently known is that one medical work by this author, Nan Jing Wen Nan, is extant. The title refers to the Nan Jing (Classic of Difficult Issues), a foundational text of Chinese medicine, and the work discusses basic theories such as pulse studies, meridians, the viscera, and acupoints in a question-and-answer format. The phrase "wen nan" echoes the original text's structure and suggests that the author raises questions and offers analysis of the classical meanings. It can therefore be inferred that Zhou Dajun focused on interpreting and clarifying medical classics rather than compiling formulas or clinical case records. The writing likely follows the traditional commentator's approach of posing questions and explaining passages one by one, comparing the classic with later annotations to help readers understand the more abstruse parts of the Nan Jing. Because reliable information on the author's life, native place, and period is lacking, it is not possible to determine scholarly lineage or mentorship, and excessive claims about influence should be avoided. On present evidence, the work is best regarded as a reference for studying Chinese medical classics, suitable for readers learning pulse diagnosis and meridian theory.