Principles of Administrative Acts
Tags
Summary
This book applies the inductive method in combination with the case method, describing "what has in fact been practiced judicially" to induce and summarize the current de facto state of administrative acts. Overall, the book is written not from a legislative standpoint but from an interpretive one.
In terms of structure, the book does not adopt the format of a textbook; instead, it divides administrative acts into different categories—such as concrete administrative acts, abstract administrative acts, and administrative acts upon application—and treats each in a separate chapter. Such an arrangement helps readers understand the book's problem awareness, research methods, analytical framework, and conclusions. To this end, the author briefly introduces the line of inquiry at the beginning of each chapter and provides a short concluding remark after each section.
Editor's review
The greatest value of this book lies in its theoretical depth and systematic coherence. Professor Ye Bifeng is not only well versed in the administrative law traditions of Germany and other civil law jurisdictions but also able to creatively transform them in light of China's practice of administrative rule of law. The book's discussion of the distinction between "concrete and abstract administrative acts," the multidimensional analysis of the validity of administrative acts (presumptive validity, determinative effect, binding effect, and enforceability), and the principles of administrative procedure all reflect the author's deep scholarship and original thinking. For readers who wish to go beyond the surface of statutory provisions and understand the legal logic underlying the exercise of administrative power, this is an excellent advanced reader.
Reading this book requires some basic grounding in administrative law, but its exposition is clear and its logic rigorous; even if certain theoretical details prove demanding, following the author's line of argument will yield a macro-level grasp of the core propositions of administrative law. The fine publishing quality of The Commercial Press also ensures a good reading experience. Overall, this is a classic theoretical work that can significantly deepen one's legal thinking and deserves repeated study.
Who it's for
A good fit for
- Upper-level undergraduates or graduate students in law who wish to deepen their understanding of core theories of administrative law
- Scholars and teachers engaged in research or teaching of administrative law, for whom it can serve as an important theoretical reference
- Legal practitioners (such as judges, lawyers, and government legal counsel) who need to grasp issues of the validity and procedure of administrative acts at the level of principle
- Interdisciplinary scholars or serious general readers with a strong interest in public law theory
Not a good fit for
- Readers seeking an introductory popular work on administrative law or quick exam-preparation materials
- Readers interested only in specific administrative law institutions or case practice and lacking the patience for theoretical inquiry
Reading tips
- It is advisable first to read through the table of contents to grasp the book's overall structure centered on "principles," then to study it chapter by chapter in depth
- While reading, consult and compare relevant statutory provisions such as China's Administrative Litigation Law and Administrative Penalty Law to appreciate the interaction between theory and positive law
- For sections involving comparative law such as German law, if they feel unfamiliar, readers may first grasp the core arguments without over-focusing on details, concentrating on their significance for Chinese theory
About the publisher
The Commercial Press is a publisher known for classic works and academic publishing, with titles spanning Eastern philosophy, foreign literature, world history, social culture, and applied psychology. Its list includes classical commentaries such as Zhu Xi's Collected Commentaries on the Analects and Wang Bi's Commentary on the Zhouyi, as well as modern annotated translations like Zhuangzi with Modern Notes and Translation. In foreign literature it offers War and Peace and Crime and Punishment, while in world history it carries Braudel's The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II. Applied psychology is represented by Irvin D. Yalom's Existential Psychotherapy, and ethical texts include a Greek-Chinese-English edition of the Nicomachean Ethics. Its authors and translators include Zhu Xi, Wang Bi, Yalom, Braudel, and translators such as Huang Zheng, Zhang Yiling, Shen Dongyu, and Tang Jialong, balancing the editing of original texts with academic translation.
Contents
- 版权信息
- 中华当代学术著作辑要 出版说明
- 前言
- 缩略语
- 案例缩略名
- 第一章 绪论
- 第一节 法学思潮与行政行为
- 一、概念法学与行政行为范畴
- 二、社会法学与行政行为的嬗变
- 三、发现法学与行政行为的实施
- 本节小结
- 第二节 依法治国与行政行为
- 一、行政行为的服务性
- 二、行政行为的过程性
- 三、行政行为的从属法律性
- 四、行政行为的无偿性
- 本节小结
- 第三节 宪法行为与行政行为
- 一、区分宪法行为与行政行为的必要性
- 二、宪法行为与行政行为的理论分析
- 三、宪法行为与行政行为的现实考察
- 四、宪法行为与行政行为的转化
- 本节小结
- 第二章 行政行为的分类和模式
- 第一节 行政行为的分类学说
- 一、行政行为分类的社会需求
- 二、行政行为的分类与内涵
- 三、行政行为的分类与立法
- 本节小结
- 第二节 行政行为的模式建构
- 一、行政行为模式界说
- 二、行政行为模式的价值
- 三、行政行为的模式化
- 四、行政行为的模式体系
- 本节小结
- 第三章 抽象行政行为的基本理论
- 第一节 抽象行政行为的由来和范围
- 一、抽象行政行为概念的由来
- 二、抽象行政行为的范围
- 本节小结
- 第二节 抽象行政行为的合法性要件
- 一、抽象行政行为合法性要件的概括
- 二、抽象行政行为合法性要件的内容
- 本节小结
- 第四章 抽象行政行为的合法性分析
- 第一节 “分税制决定”属超越权限
- 一、国务院是否具有权限依据
- 二、国务院是否获得了授权
- 三、政策不能作为权限依据
- 四、国务院是否具有法外权
- 五、全国人大的追认是否合适
- 六、追问分税制决定权的意义
- 本节小结
- 第二节 部门规则不能规定应急征用补偿
- 一、政府部门无权创制应急征用规则
- 二、政府部门无权细化应急征用条款
- 三、政府部门无权应急征用不为补偿条款推翻
- 四、规则抄袭或细化于法治有害无益
- 本节小结
- 第五章 具体行政行为的构成要件
- 第一节 行政权能要件
- 一、主体资格要件的改造
- 二、行政权能的取得
- 三、行政权能的认定
- 本节小结
- 第二节 行政权运用要件
- 一、运用行政权的外延界限
- 二、运用行政权的内涵特征
- 本节小结
- 第三节 法律效果要件
- 一、外部法律效果
- 二、“直接产生”
- 本节小结
- 第六章 依申请行政行为的实践
- 第一节 受欺诈行政行为的法律责任
- 一、法院对受欺诈行政行为的审查
- 二、违法与过错的不对应性
- 三、受欺诈行政行为的责任
- 四、我国相关法制的改革
- 本节小结
- 第二节 依申请公开政府信息的行为
- 一、可诉的政府信息公开行为
- 二、拒绝公开政府信息的理由
- 三、同意公开政府信息的内容
- 本节小结
- 第七章 需合作行政行为制度的考察
- 第一节 需合作行政行为的类型和责任
- 一、需合作行政行为制度的类型
- 二、需合作行政行为的责任
- 本节小结
- 第二节 需补充行政行为制度及改革
- 一、需补充行政行为的制度设计
- 二、需补充行政行为的改革建议
- 本节小结
- 第三节 需补充行政行为的责任
- 一、未经补充的瑕疵责任
- 二、经审批的执法责任
- 本节小结
- 第八章 具体行政行为的错误和瑕疵
- 第一节 具体行政行为的错误和更正
- 一、具体行政行为的错误及其类型
- 二、具体行政行为更正的含义和效力
- 三、具体行政行为更正的时间、方式和主体
- 本节小结
- 第二节 具体行政行为的瑕疵类型
- 一、具体行政行为瑕疵的界定
- 二、明显轻微瑕疵
- 三、重大明显的瑕疵
- 本节小结
- 第九章 具体行政行为的效力原理
- 第一节 具体行政行为效力的内容
- 一、具体行政行为的公定力
- 二、具体行政行为的确定力
- 三、具体行政行为的其他效力
- 本节小结
- 第二节 具体行政行为的效力时间
- 一、具体行政行为的生效
- 二、具体行政行为的失效
- 三、具体行政行为的追溯力
- 四、具体行政行为效力的中止
- 本节小结
- 第十章 行政协议和行政合同的实践
- 第一节 区域经济一体化孕育的行政协议
- 一、行政协议的法治基础
- 二、区域政府间行政协议的缔结
- 三、区域政府间行政协议的履行
- 本节小结
- 第二节 行政合同的司法探索和态度
- 一、行政合同的发展
- 二、行政合同与民事合同的区别
- 三、行政合同的缔结和履行
- 四、行政合同的履行诉讼
- 本节小结
- 主要参考文献
- 一、中译文献
- 二、中文著作
- 三、中文论文
- 四、英文文献
FAQ
How does this book differ from the author's other textbook, Administrative Law and Administrative Litigation Law?
Can I understand this book without any background in German law?
Is this book helpful for preparing for the National Unified Legal Professional Qualification Examination?
Comments
Find this book
This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.
About the author
Ye Bifeng appears in the library with a single work, Principles of Administrative Acts, commonly classified under law. Publicly available information is limited: his nationality, dates of birth and death, and educational background are not clearly recorded, so this introduction makes no biographical conjectures and focuses instead on the known work. Judging from the title and classification, the book is a monograph in administrative law, discussing the composition, validity, and operation of administrative acts, and addressing the legal boundaries and procedural requirements that apply when administrative bodies make decisions and exercise management. Writing of this kind typically demands clear concepts and rigorous logic, with attention to both legal doctrine and practice, and is suited to legal researchers, practitioners, and students of administrative law. Classified under law in the library, the work is the main basis for understanding Ye Bifeng's writing orientation.