The Second Kind of Impossible
Tags
Summary
Editor's review
Who it's for
A good fit for
- General readers who enjoy narrative popular science and the experience of reading a mystery
- Students who want to understand the real process of scientific research and how scientists think
- Educators and popular science creators who need to tell stories of scientific exploration to others
- Cross-disciplinary readers interested in trial and error, obstacles, and reversals in research
Not a good fit for
- Utilitarian readers who only want quick access to conclusions and key knowledge points
- Exam-preparation readers who expect systematic textbook-style knowledge organization and a rigorous knowledge system
- Readers who lack patience for research-process details and prefer short, fragmented reading
Reading tips
- Read in chapter order, following the clues the author lays out; do not flip to the end for conclusions first.
- When scientists hit an obstacle or change direction, pause and think: if it were you, how would you judge the next step?
- Keep a sheet of paper to record the book's key clues and reversals, and after finishing, review how the research thinking changed.
- Read together with others and discuss the methods in the book, turning detective-style reading into an understanding of scientific method
Contents
- 版权信息
- 推荐序 寻根问底的追“凶”之旅:一个关于准晶的故事
- 赞誉
- 前言 为期30年的探索
- 第一部分 让不可能成为可能
- 01 不可能
- 02 彭罗斯难题
- 03 找到漏洞
- 04 双实验室并行记
- 05 振奋人心的故事
- 06 完美的不可能
- 第二部分 追索开始了
- 07 自然打败过我们吗
- 08 新伙伴卢卡·宾迪
- 09 “准”新年快乐
- 10 当你说这不可能的时候
- 11 蓝队与红队的对决
- 12 上帝若非有意捉弄,就是太过任性
- 13 神秘的秘密日记
- 14 关键人物——瓦列里·克里亚奇科
- 15 罕见之物中包藏着某种不可能
- 16 二十面体石
- 第三部分 去堪察加半岛,否则等着“项目流产”吧
- 17 失踪
- 18 失而复得
- 19 99%
- 20 取得突破
- 21 奇迹之人
- 22 大自然的秘密
- 致谢
- 图片来源
FAQ
Is this book a novel or popular science?
Does reading this book require a science background?
Why is the reading experience said to be like a detective novel?
Is it suitable for students as reading on scientific method?
Comments
Find this book
This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.
About the author
Paul Steinhardt, an American theoretical physicist born in 1952, is a professor at Princeton University. He is known for his contributions to quasicrystal research and cosmological models, with an academic scope spanning condensed matter physics and cosmology. The library holds one work by him, The Second Kind of Impossible. According to the current classification, the book is categorized as science fiction, an interesting contrast with the author's identity as a scientist; it suggests the novel may build its narrative around scientific concepts and weave reflections on natural laws and the boundaries of possibility into its fictional plot. Because the library's materials are limited, details about the book's plot, characters, and writing techniques remain sparse in publicly available sources and cannot yet be described in depth. Overall, Steinhardt's writing is grounded in rigorous scientific training, and the value of his work lies more in offering intellectual support for stories from a professional perspective, giving readers access to frontier concepts such as quasicrystals and cosmology.
Gao Yuedan is a Chinese author about whom limited public information is available. What can be confirmed is that their writing involves the field of science fiction, with one work included in the library collection, The Second Kind of Impossible. Judging from the available information, this work is categorized as science fiction, indicating that the author develops narrative and imagination within this genre. Since no clear records of biographical details, educational background, or writing career are available, it is difficult to give a fuller account of the author's development, and it would be inappropriate to make excessive inferences about stylistic features. Based on the existing work, readers may regard the author as a writer working in the direction of science fiction, whose work deserves to be read and discussed in the context of the genre. More public information is still needed regarding the author and any future writing.