Record of Brush Methods
Tags
Summary
Editor's review
Who it's for
A good fit for
- Readers studying Chinese painting and art history who need to study painting theory
- Upper-level students interested in traditional aesthetics and art theory
- Enthusiasts willing to read the original text closely alongside works and annotations
Not a good fit for
- Readers hoping for light stories or popular introductions to art
- Those lacking patience for classical Chinese and unwilling to look up terminology
- Readers who only want modern vernacular rewrites and do not want to engage with the original text
Reading tips
- First learn about Jing Hao and the background of Five Dynasties landscape painting; the main text will then be much easier to understand.
- Read alongside landscape paintings and connect the painting theory in the text with specific images.
- Keep a notebook, excerpt key concepts, and write down your questions for a second reading.
Contents
- 版权信息
- 正文一
- 正文二
FAQ
What is "Notes on Brushwork" mainly about?
Can I read this book without a foundation in painting?
How is this edition different from ordinary anthologies of painting theory?
Related on WeRead
Comments
Find this book
This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.
About the author
Jing Hao: little is known about his life, and public information is limited. His birthplace, dates of birth and death, and specific experiences are not reliably recorded. Two works are extant under his name, Bifa Ji (Notes on Brushwork) and Hua Shanshui Fu (Rhapsody on Painting Landscape), and they are commonly classified under Eastern philosophy. Both concern landscape painting: the first, in note form, discusses brushwork, conception, and the merits and faults of painting methods, while also evaluating earlier painting styles; the second, in rhapsodic form, sets out the atmosphere and compositional arrangement of landscape painting, combining theoretical discussion with literary quality. His writing avoids cumbersome textual scholarship, preferring concise statements that highlight key principles of painting and raise technical questions to the level of harmony between mind and nature, for which he is often cited and discussed in the tradition of painting theory. Given the limited material, details of his life and artistic lineage await further study.