Treatise on Grain
Tags
Summary
Editor's review
Who it's for
A good fit for
- Scholars and graduate students in agricultural history and the history of science and technology
- Readers interested in traditional rice-farming culture and local knowledge
- Enthusiasts of traditional culture who collect and study original classics of Chinese learning
Not a good fit for
- Practical readers seeking modern rice-cultivation techniques
- General readers who prefer popular stories or light reading
Reading tips
- First read the table of contents to clarify the book's organization, then select sections by topic.
- Keep an agricultural history reference book at hand to check terms and names at any time.
- After reading, organize information on varieties and seasons into concise notes.
Contents
- 版权信息
- 禾谱题序
- 禾谱序
- 正文
FAQ
What does He Pu mainly record?
Can readers without a background in agronomy understand it?
What are the features of this edition?
Comments
Find this book
This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.
About the author
Zeng Anzhi's life is very sparsely documented in publicly available sources; his nationality, dates of birth and death, and English name are not clearly recorded. What can be confirmed is that he is the author of one work, He Pu (A Register of Grain), which is classified in some library catalogues under literary appreciation. The title He Pu suggests a register-style account of rice plants, farming, or related subjects, and the pu (register) genre itself combines systematic record-keeping with literary description, which may explain its placement in the literary appreciation category. From the available evidence, Zeng Anzhi's writing appears to emphasize close observation and orderly arrangement of concrete subjects, presenting knowledge of names and things in a concise, well-organized manner that is both practical and readable. Because only one work survives and related historical materials are scarce, his biography, social connections, and overall literary output remain difficult to examine in detail; readers and researchers should exercise caution when citing him and should focus on the subject matter and stylistic features of He Pu.