Cat Compendium
Tags
Summary
Editor's review
Who it's for
A good fit for
- Readers of literature and history interested in ancient animal notebooks and the lore of names and things
- Enthusiasts who want to know how traditional scholars collected and classified material on cats
- General readers who keep cats and enjoy reading anecdotes of ancient cat culture
- Scholars working on Qing-dynasty notebooks, encyclopedic works, or folklore sources
Not a good fit for
- Readers expecting a systematic cat-care guide or modern animal-behavior knowledge
- Casual readers who need a continuous narrative or a complete story
- Beginners with little patience for the classical-notebook genre and scattered entries
Reading tips
- Begin with the prefaces and table of contents to grasp the eight-juan classification, then browse individual categories as interest dictates.
- Keep a notebook to jot down the sources of entries and recurring allusions for easy comparison.
- Read alongside ancient animal compendia such as the Xiangma Jing or Hu Yuan to observe differences in editorial method.
- Do not strive to read it through; take one or two juan at a time as desk-side topical browsing.
Contents
- 版权信息
- 《猫乘》小引
- 《猫乘》卷一上
- 《猫乘》卷一下
- 卷二
- 卷三
- 卷四
- 卷五
- 卷六
- 卷七
- 卷八
FAQ
Is Mao Cheng a cat-care guide?
Can I read it without a foundation in classical Chinese?
What does cheng in the title mean?
Why does the author say he is "overcome with self-reproach and self-pity"?
Comments
Find this book
This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.
About the author
Wang Chutong was a scholar-author of the Qing dynasty. His life is now largely obscure: reliable public sources are limited, and his birth and death years, native place, and official career cannot be firmly established. One work survives under his name, Maocheng (A Treatise on Cats). Judging from its title and content, the book gathers anecdotes, observations, and comments on cats, combining antiquarian interest with leisurely appreciation; it is often classified under Eastern philosophy. This reflects the traditional literati approach of examining principles through everyday things and expressing personal sensibility. The work is arranged in the manner of miscellaneous notes, with entries of varied length and a plain, concise style that occasionally shows textual scholarship. It offers readers insight into ancient knowledge and attitudes concerning cats and provides concrete material for the study of traditional natural-history writing and everyday culture. Because other writings and experiences of the author lack reliable records, his intellectual affiliations and social circles remain to be further investigated.