Talks on Drama
Tags
Summary
Traditional Chinese thought and culture have a long history and are highly original, inventive, and literary. Early forms of thought are especially distinctive: religious theology, classical texts of Chinese medicine, ancient military strategy, Confucianism, Daoism, Buddhism and the Hundred Schools, feng shui and metaphysics, the Twenty-Four Histories, customs and local gazetteers—these subjects are vast and profound. This series, "Essence of Chinese Classics: Original Texts," preserves the original appearance of the books and focuses on conserving and transmitting traditional Chinese thought and culture. By reading the literary essence left by ancient sages, readers can cultivate their temperament and quietly absorb the classics of Chinese learning.
Editor's review
Quhua is a work of drama criticism by Liang Tingnan of the Qing dynasty and an important document of ancient Chinese drama scholarship. Unlike catalog-summary works, it focuses on discussing drama: evaluating authors and works, discussing tonal rules and literary diction, and distinguishing the origins and creative merits of drama, with a distinctly critical eye. Included in the series "Essence of Chinese Classics: Original Texts" and preserving the original appearance of the book, it is suitable as a base text for thematic study of drama scholarship. The key to reading this book is to place it back in the context of ancient drama criticism and understand the author's evaluative standards and historical limitations, rather than taking one person's view as final. For drama researchers and students of ancient literary criticism, it provides primary material for the history of criticism; for general readers, it is best to read selected passages discussing familiar authors or plays, in conjunction with the original works, to appreciate the measure and interest of its criticism.
Who it's for
A good fit for
- Researchers of ancient Chinese drama criticism and literary theory who need primary qunhua material
- Students of ancient literature in Chinese departments, for thematic reading in drama theory
- Advanced enthusiasts familiar with Yuan, Ming, and Qing drama who want to learn how earlier critics evaluated plays
- Practitioners of drama writing and criticism, using earlier drama theory to reflect on structure and diction
Not a good fit for
- Complete beginners with no basic knowledge of ancient drama who wish to read the plays first
- Readers who want only modern vernacular appreciation and do not wish to engage with classical Chinese critical texts
- Beginners expecting a systematic textbook-style general history of drama and a complete knowledge framework
Reading tips
- Begin with entries discussing plays you are familiar with, then gradually expand to theoretical passages on tonal rules and diction.
- Keep an anthology of drama works or a catalog of play outlines at hand, and compare the comments with the original plots and arias.
- Pay attention to the author's evaluative standards and terms of praise and blame, distinguish factual records from personal judgments, and do not take one person's view as final.
- After reading, organize notes by theme—such as structure, tonal rules, and authors—to form your own list of questions in drama scholarship.
Contents
- 版权信息
- 曲话提要
- 曲话卷一 清梁廷枬着
- 曲话卷二
- 曲话卷三
- 曲话卷四
- 曲话卷五
FAQ
What is Quhua mainly about?
It is a work of ancient drama scholarship, mainly offering evaluations of drama authors and works, and also touching on tonal rules, diction, origins, and creative merits. Readers can see what earlier critics focused on and how they criticized, making it primary material for the history of drama criticism.
Which drama works should one be familiar with before reading?
It is best to have a basic understanding of representative Yuan, Ming, and Qing drama works, at least knowing the general plots of common plays. Otherwise the background of the works referred to in the comments will be unclear, the reading will feel vague, and it will be hard to judge whether the author's evaluations are fair.
Can the views in the book be taken directly as conclusions?
Not advisable. Quhua carries the author's personal aesthetic and historical limitations, and his praise and blame may not be objective. A better approach is to treat it as a sample of criticism, read it alongside the original works and other drama criticism, understand its standpoint, and then form your own judgment.
How can general readers read it without finding it dull?
It need not be read in order; one can start from familiar plays or topics of interest and read a few entries at a time alongside the original works. Treat the comments as an earlier critic's on-the-spot record of talking about drama, and focus on why he evaluates as he does—this is more interesting than memorizing conclusions.
Comments
Find this book
This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.
About the author
梁廷枬
Author
Public information about Liang Tingnan, including his life and nationality, is limited. It is currently known only that one work by him, Qü Hua (Talks on Song), has come down to us, and it is commonly classified under Eastern philosophy. Judging from the title and classification, the book likely discusses the traditional art of qü, perhaps covering its origins and development, creative concepts, and criteria of evaluation, with a certain speculative dimension. Because complete biographical materials are lacking, it is difficult to know his academic background or the circumstances in which the book was written; readers should focus on the text itself and, through its discussion of qü, appreciate how a traditional literatus understood and evaluated artistic forms such as opera and sanqü. As his only extant work, it is modest in size but serves as direct material for understanding Liang Tingnan's literary thought and as a reference text for the study of traditional qü criticism.
