Correcting Errors in Old Accounts
Tags
Summary
Editor's review
Who it's for
A good fit for
- Readers interested in Song-dynasty historiography and documentary evidential research
- Lovers of literature and history who enjoy note-style works on correcting errors and evidential investigation
- History students who need training in awareness of source comparison
- Readers willing to read the original texts slowly and take reading notes
Not a good fit for
- General readers hoping for light stories or an overview of general history
- Beginners lacking a foundation in classical Chinese and unwilling to consult reference works
- Readers expecting detailed modern scholarly annotation and systematic organization
Reading tips
- First read the table of contents, choose entries on historical events or figures you are familiar with, then gradually expand to adjacent entries.
- As you read, note the questions the author raises, the evidence used, and the conclusions drawn, so as to grasp the logic of error identification.
- When encountering unfamiliar old reports, first consult relevant histories or reference works, then return to the original text to avoid understanding it in isolation.
Contents
- 版权信息
- 卷一
- 卷二
- 卷三
- 卷四
- 补遗
FAQ
What is Old Anecdotes Corrected Errors mainly about?
Do I need prior knowledge of Song history to read this book?
Does this edition have modern annotation?
Comments
Find this book
This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.
About the author
Li Xinchuan was a historian of the Southern Song dynasty. Publicly available sources offer limited information about his life, including his dates of birth and death and his native place; his name has come down to later generations chiefly through his writings. The library holds one work by him, Jiuwen Zhengyu (Corrections of Old Reports), classified among classic works. According to surviving records, Li Xinchuan approached history with an emphasis on textual criticism and the resolution of doubts, habitually comparing sources and collating variant accounts, and he often corrected rumors and old claims. Jiuwen Zhengyu reflects this inclination: its title makes clear its purpose of verifying old reports and pointing out errors, and its contents focus on the examination of historical events and the analysis of documents. The style is concise and grounded in evidence rather than empty discussion. Though such a work does not narrate history in the manner of a chronological or biographical history, it offers later scholars reference points for the study of Song dynasty affairs and the sources of historical materials, and it reflects the Song scholarly tendency to value evidence and careful discrimination. Because extant materials are limited, details of his life and official career cannot be described in full; only the characteristics of his writings can be briefly noted here.