Daily Record
Tags
Summary
Editor's review
Who it's for
A good fit for
- Readers interested in Ming Neo-Confucianism and the Confucian self-cultivation tradition
- Readers who enjoy diary-style and note-style writing by the ancients
- Readers who wish to use traditional cultivation methods to reflect on themselves
- Students of Chinese intellectual history who need supplementary primary sources
Not a good fit for
- Readers seeking storytelling and entertaining reading experiences
- Those who want a systematic overview of Chinese learning but are unwilling to read primary texts closely
Reading tips
- Read a small section each day and write a few reflections alongside your self-examination; there is no need to rush.
- First learn about Wu Yubi and the early Ming Neo-Confucian background, then approach the text.
- Excerpt and categorize the self-cultivation entries in the book for later review.
- Read alongside Neo-Confucian anthologies such as Jinsi Lu to understand its scholarly position.
Contents
- 版权信息
- 日录
- 一
- 二
FAQ
What is Ri Lu mainly about?
What background is needed to read this book?
Is this book suitable for reading straight through?
Comments
Find this book
This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.
About the author
Wu Yubi appears in Chinese bibliographic records, but his life, dates of birth and death, and nationality are no longer clearly ascertainable, and publicly available information is limited. One work attributed to him survives in the collection, the Rilu (Daily Records), classified under Eastern philosophy. Judging from its title and category, the book is likely a diary or notebook of Confucian self-cultivation, recording daily conduct, reading reflections, and the observation of mind and nature. Its style is plain and concise, without ornamentation, and it stresses self-examination and personal practice. Works of this kind are often regarded by later readers as primary sources for the author's thought and the scholarly ethos of his time, and they offer reference value for understanding the tradition of Confucianism that emphasizes daily practical effort. Because the relevant documents are scattered and lack systematic arrangement, Wu Yubi's overall body of work and scholarly standing await further verification, and readers should consult the original text with care.