Notes of the Jianyan Era
Tags
Summary
Editor's review
Who it's for
A good fit for
- Readers researching or studying the history of the early Southern Song
- Enthusiasts interested in Song dynasty notebook sources and political observations
- Readers with classical Chinese proficiency willing to consult background materials
- History students in need of primary records of the Jianyan court
Not a good fit for
- Beginners seeking vernacular popular history stories
- Readers unwilling to consult Song-era background materials who want light reading
- Readers seeking a systematic general-history framework rather than notebook sources
Reading tips
- First understand the Song-Jin situation and court politics of the Jianyan era, then read this book to better grasp the relationships among figures.
- While reading, compare with the relevant annals and biographies in Song Shi, noting differences between notebook records and official history.
- Excerpt by figure or event to accumulate leads on primary sources in Song political history.
Contents
- 版权信息
- 卷一
- 建炎三年巳酉岁
- 建炎四年庚戌岁
- 绍兴二年壬子岁
- 卷二
- 绍兴六年丙辰岁
- 卷三
- 绍兴七年丁巳岁
FAQ
What kind of book is Jianyan Bilu?
What background knowledge is needed to read this book?
How does this book differ from general works on Song history?
Comments
Find this book
This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.
About the author
Zhao Ding's official career, dates of birth and death, and native place are not clearly recorded, and publicly available information is limited. Judging from the two works collected here, Bianwu Bilu (Records of Defending Against False Accusations) and Jianyan Bilu (Records of the Jianyan Era), his writing is closely tied to the political memory and the correction of historical records in the early Southern Song: "Jianyan" is the reign title of Emperor Gaozong of Song, while "bianwu" points to the intent of defending those wrongly accused and clearing up misrepresentations. Both works may be classified as notes and historical records that emphasize eyewitness accounts and the examination of right and wrong. His style appears to favor plain recording of events and clear organization, valuing factual records over praise and blame, and bearing a distinct mark of his time. Such works can support research on the politics and figures of the early Southern Song, and are often consulted by later generations for understanding the situation of scholars and the disputes over historical events of that period. Because the relevant materials are limited, details of his life and intellectual background await further investigation.