On the Official System
Tags
Summary
Friends have repeatedly asked to see the manuscript, so it is now printed for the benefit of like-minded readers. Dr. Ariga's arguments are presented for their general principles rather than confined narrowly to the institutions of one country; and since our own country is vast in territory and large in population, and can scarcely adopt wholesale the established administrative organizations of other nations, the work also draws on wide inquiry and adds the author's own judgments, with especially detailed treatment of the relationship between central and local government. May it be of some use to those who discuss official systems.
Editor's review
Who it's for
A good fit for
- Scholars and students of modern Chinese official systems and administrative institutions
- Readers interested in central-local relations
- Researchers needing early comparative-administration literature
Not a good fit for
- Readers seeking a guide to current official systems or civil-service exam preparation
- Readers who prefer popular storytelling and lack patience for institutional history
- Beginners expecting a systematic textbook format
Reading tips
- Read the central-local relations section first, then return to the overall argumentative framework of the two parts.
- Prepare a modern institutional history timeline for comparison, and note the translators' period standpoint and terminological differences.
- Record the method of discussing institutions without being 'confined narrowly to one country' for use in comparing other administrative-organization literature.
Contents
- 版权信息
- 序
- 上篇
- 第一章 立宪国官制之原则
- 第二章 内阁官制
- 下篇
- 第三章 地方官制
FAQ
Is this book suitable as an introductory reader on official systems?
Why does the book treat central-local relations in particular detail?
Do readers need to know Ariga Nagao's background?
Comments
Find this book
This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.
About the author
Zeng Yijin: public information is limited, and at present he is known only as the author of one extant work, Guan Zhi Pian (On the Official System), commonly classified under politics. Judging from the title, the work deals with the structure of government, the division of duties and powers among officials, and the evolution of institutions, and thus belongs to writing on political systems and administrative organization. Works of this kind usually combine institutional provisions with actual practice, pay attention to historical continuity and comparison between systems, and adopt a practical style in the service of observing and reflecting on political institutions. Because no reliable record of his birth and death dates, nationality, or life history has been found, his period of activity and scholarly background remain difficult to establish; his orientation can only be inferred from this single work. On the available evidence, Zeng Yijin is not a widely known author and his work had a limited circulation, yet in the specialized field of official systems it may still serve as reference material for readers studying the history of political institutions and administrative organization.
Li Jinghe is an author about whom relatively little is publicly known; his native place, dates of birth and death, and educational background cannot be confirmed from available sources. His concerns can nonetheless be inferred from the two works recorded in the collection: Guan Yi Xian Ping and Guan Zhi Pian. The former falls under social culture and, judging by its title, uses casual remarks made while watching a chess game as a starting point for commenting on social customs, written in an informal, essayistic style. The latter falls under politics and discusses the system of officials, touching on institutional change and constitutional or administrative debate. The two subjects are quite far apart—one leaning toward social and cultural observation, the other toward political and institutional reflection—which suggests the author paid attention to both everyday social order and questions of governance. Given the limited available material, his writing style and influence are difficult to describe in detail; readers may form their own sense of his choice of subjects and manner of argument from these two works.