The Golden Casket of the Grand Duke
Tags
Summary
The Golden Casket of the Grand Duke (Taigong Jin Kui) is a pre-Qin text attributed to Lü Wang (Jiang Shang), the Grand Duke of the early Zhou, though the original work is lost and only reconstructed editions survive. According to the "Treatise on Literature" in the Book of Han, it originally belonged to the seventy-one "Sayings" chapters within the 237-chapter Grand Duke corpus and was classified among Daoist works; the Bibliography of the Book of Sui and the Bibliography of the Old Book of Tang, however, list "The Golden Casket of the Grand Duke, in two scrolls" under military texts. The Qing scholar Shen Qinhan held that the "Sayings" were the Grand Duke's Golden Casket; most modern scholars believe the work came from Jixia Academy scholars of late Warring States Qi and presents Huang-Lao and military thought through dialogues between Kings Wen and Wu and the Grand Duke. The content falls roughly into four categories: first, political and military dialogues on governing the state and waging war, such as "Those who plan before acting prosper; those who act before planning perish" and "Heaven favors no one; it is ever with the good," and metaphors comparing plows, hoes, and rain hats to crossbows, spears, and helmets, arguing that the tools of defense and war lie among the common people; second, imperial maxims and warnings, including admonitions attributed to the Yellow Emperor, Yao, Shun, Yu, and Tang and the "Bronze Statue Inscription" counsel to "seal the mouth three times," along with inscriptions on caps, shoes, swords, mirrors, carriages, tables, staffs, and doors; third, principles of reward and punishment, such as "Reward one man and a thousand rejoice—reward him" and "Kill one man and a thousand fear—kill him"; fourth, yin-yang divination and myth, such as the Sanmiao sun-fighting, the waters of Mount Cen in the reign of Jie of Xia, and King Wu's encounter with the gods of the four seas on his campaign against Zhou. The original survived into the late Tang, when Yilin excerpted five passages; it faded after the Northern Song. Qing scholars Yan Kejun, Hong Yixuan, and Wang Zongyi all reconstructed fragments, which are scattered through the Taiping Yulan, Yiwen Leiju, Beitang Shuchao, Chuxue Ji, Yilin, Kaiyuan Zhanjing, and annotations to the Wenxuan. The book is an important source for the origins of the "Bronze Statue Inscription" and the fusion of Warring States military learning and yin-yang thought.
Editor's review
这是一部“看不见原书”的书:它曾以二卷之数著录于《隋志》《旧唐志》,晚唐《意林》尚能摘其五条,北宋以后却彻底失传,今天读者手中的每一个字,都是从《太平御览》《艺文类聚》《北堂书钞》《文选》注等类书古注中一句句钩沉出来的。正因如此,它的阅读体验相当特别——不是读一部完整的兵书,而是看清代辑佚学者如何用几十种文献的引文拼回一部两千年前的典籍。 内容上,它比《六韬》更“杂”:既有“先谋后事者昌”的谋略格言,也有把农具比作兵器的民间战争观;既有黄帝《金人铭》的慎言哲思,也有冠履剑镜上的自我告诫;还夹杂着三苗日斗、武王伐纣遇四海之神的占候与传说。对研究先秦兵学、黄老思想、谶纬数术以及《金人铭》真伪问题的读者来说,这是一份绕不开的原典材料。 需要提醒的是:本书无今人通俗注译本通行,辑本文字零散、出处夹注繁多,初读容易不得要领。建议与《六韬》对读,并配合辑佚来源一并理解。
Who it's for
A good fit for
- 研究先秦兵学、黄老道家的文史专业读者
- 关注《金人铭》来源与真伪问题的研究者
- 已读过《六韬》、想拓展太公一系文献的国学爱好者
- 从事古籍辑佚、类书引文考证的学习者
Not a good fit for
- 希望读一部完整故事化兵书的普通读者
- 没有任何文言基础、需要逐句白话翻译的初学者
- 想找实用管理或商战案例的职场读者
Reading tips
- 先读《汉书·艺文志》《隋志》相关著录与前言,弄清“太公书”的构成与本书性质,再进入正文。
- 把每条佚文与其出处注记对照阅读,注意同一句在不同类书中的异文,体会辑佚工作的分寸。
- 与《六韬》对读,比较“问答体兵书”中政道、兵道、器铭三类文本的差异。
- 读《金人铭》部分时,可参看学界关于其成书年代的讨论,不把托名黄帝直接当作史实。
FAQ
《太公金匮》和《金匮要略》是同一本书吗?
不是。《太公金匮》是托名姜太公的先秦兵家、黄老类典籍,原书已佚,今存清人辑本;《金匮要略》是东汉张仲景的医学方书,属中医四大经典之一。二者仅“金匮”二字相同,内容与领域完全无关。
这本书现在还有完整原书吗?
没有。原书二卷在北宋以后失传,今所见均为辑佚本。清人严可均、洪颐煊、汪宗沂等从《太平御览》《艺文类聚》《意林》《开元占经》及古注中辑出佚文,读者看到的是这些片段的汇编。
作者真的是姜太公吗?
旧题吕望撰,但学界普遍认为是战国后期齐国稷下学者托名之作。书中大量文王、武王与太公问答,属于“依托”体例,不能视为西周初年的实录。
为什么它一会儿算道家、一会儿算兵家?
《汉志》把它归入道家(作为《太公》之《言》),《隋志》《旧唐志》则著录于兵家。因内容兼有政治格言、用兵之道、器物铭戒与阴阳占候,两类目下的归属各有依据。
读这本书需要哪些基础?
需要基本的文言阅读能力,并对《汉书·艺文志》的著录体例、类书引书方式有初步了解。若能先读《六韬》或一本先秦兵学概论,理解会顺畅许多。
Comments
Find this book
This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.