A History of Ink
Tags
Summary
Editor's review
Who it's for
A good fit for
- Readers interested in the Four Treasures of the Study and traditional ink-making crafts
- Scholars and enthusiasts researching the history of ancient crafts and material culture
- Readers of Chinese studies who enjoy browsing specialized historical sources and accumulating material
Not a good fit for
- General readers expecting narrative storytelling or an introductory overview
- Ink-making practitioners seeking modern technical instruction
Reading tips
- Begin with the table of contents and browse selected entries by person or ink product; do not feel obliged to read straight through.
- Jot down ink makers and ink products of interest as you go, building your own research notes.
- Read alongside illustrated catalogs of studio objects or works on craft history to deepen your understanding of the physical objects.
Contents
- 版权信息
- 墨史提要
- 墨史卷上
- 墨史卷中
- 墨史卷下
- 附录
FAQ
Does Mushi discuss the history of ink or methods of making ink?
Can I understand this book without knowledge of studio objects?
Is this book suitable for reading straight through from beginning to end?
Related on WeRead
Comments
Find this book
This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.
About the author
Lu You's official career, dates of birth and death, and other biographical details are not clearly recorded in publicly available sources, and the limited material makes it difficult to describe his family background or life in detail. Judging from the two works held in the collection, Mo Shi (A History of Ink) and Yanbei Zazhi (Miscellaneous Notes from Yanbei), his writing falls broadly within the fields of cultural history and Eastern philosophy. Mo Shi discusses the origins and production of ink and belongs to the specialized literature on traditional stationery crafts, while Yanbei Zazhi is a collection of miscellaneous notes dealing largely with observations, textual criticism, and reading reflections. Though different in genre—one a focused topical study, the other a body of occasional jottings—both show a concern for cultural antiquities and the study of objects, with plain and substantial prose that values sources and evidence over rhetorical display. Because records of the man and his life are sparse, later readers have come to know Lu You mainly through these two works, whose value lies chiefly in preserving knowledge of traditional crafts and literati miscellany.