Rites of Zhou
Tags
Summary
Editor's review
Who it's for
A good fit for
- Researchers of ancient Chinese history and pre-Qin institutional history who need to study ritual texts
- Students of classical studies and Chinese philosophy who need to master the basic texts of the Three Rites
- Enthusiasts of traditional culture who want to understand ancient official systems and concepts of ritual and music
- Middle school Chinese teachers who need background knowledge for teaching classical prose
Not a good fit for
- General readers seeking light, story-driven reading with no interest in institutional texts
- Beginners with weak classical Chinese who are unwilling to consult commentaries and reference works
- Readers who want direct access to authentic pre-Qin official archives and ignore questions of the text's composition
Reading tips
- Begin with the preface or introduction to understand the controversy over the date of composition and the relationship among the Three Rites, then proceed to the main text.
- Read section by section with Zheng Xuan's commentary as an aid; when encountering official titles or ritual terminology, consult the notes first and then return to the original text.
- Read in blocks according to the Offices of Heaven, Earth, Spring, Summer, Autumn, and Winter, grasping the framework of offices in each part first.
- Read alongside works on pre-Qin history and the history of classical scholarship, distinguishing the text's idealized designs from historical institutions.
About the publisher
Jinzhang Book Company (Jinzhang Shuju) was a private publishing and distribution house in Shanghai during the late Qing and early Republican periods, issuing traditional works by lithographic printing. Judging from the 1,194 titles in the collection, its publishing focused on classical poetry, Eastern philosophy, historical reading, traditional Chinese medical texts, and canonical works, along with books on literary appreciation. Representative titles include the poetry and prose collections of Du Fu and Ouyang Xiu; historical works such as the Book of Han and Zizhi Tongjian; classical texts such as the Book of Documents and Mencius; and specialized and literary classics such as Treatise on Cold Damage and Li Sao. Its author resources cover major figures across the ages, including Du Fu, Ban Gu, Sima Guang, Zhang Zhongjing, Qu Yuan, Ouyang Xiu, and Tang Shenwei, reflecting the house's characteristic reliance on traditional scholarship and medical literature while serving general readers. Public information on its early history and operational details is limited, so no conjecture is offered here.
Contents
- 版权信息
- 周礼
FAQ
Was the Rites of Zhou really written by the Duke of Zhou?
What role does Zheng Xuan's commentary play in reading?
What is the relationship between the Rites of Zhou, the Yili, and the Liji?
If my classical Chinese is only average, how should I read it?
Comments
Find this book
This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.
About the author
Zhou Gongdan, also known as the Duke of Zhou, is a celebrated statesman and thinker in ancient China. His life is recorded in transmitted classical texts, yet reliable information about his exact dates, birthplace, and education is limited in publicly available sources. This site lists two works under his name, both associated with the Rites of Zhou (Zhouli). The Zhouli is organized around the bureaucracy, systematically setting out the structure and division of state governance and covering ritual institutions, administration, and moral instruction. Its style is orderly and precise, with a strong emphasis on institutional design. Traditionally classified among the Confucian classics, the text is an important source for the study of ancient ritual and political thought and has deeply influenced later Confucian ideals of governance and discussions of institutions. Readers should bear in mind the complexity of its textual history and treat it as a document of ancient institutional and cultural conceptions rather than a direct record of one author's time and place.