Nostalgia

滕固Oct 2017

3.4

Word count: 7.9K words
Chapters: 4

Summary

Teng Gu (1901–1941), courtesy name Ruoqu, was a native of Yuepu Town, Baoshan, Shanghai. He was a pioneer in his time and made distinctive contributions in many academic fields, including poetics, art aesthetics, cultural studies, painting history, literary criticism, art archaeology, methodology, and scholarly translation.

Editor's review

This volume gathers writings by Teng Gu; though limited in length, it offers a glimpse of his literary profile. Teng Gu was a rare cross-disciplinary scholar of the Republican era, with pioneering achievements in poetics, art aesthetics, cultural studies, painting history, literary criticism, art archaeology, and other fields. The value of this small book lies, on the one hand, in presenting the emotional texture of his literary writing, and on the other, in offering clues to the underpinnings of his later academic interests. Teng Gu should not be read merely as a writer of ordinary nostalgic prose; readers may also note a mode of expression that combines literary sensibility with scholarly judgment. It suits unhurried reading in quiet moments; the book is short and rewards repeated savoring. For those interested in the multiple identities of Republican-era scholars, it serves as an accessible entry point. It should be noted that the available material covers only the author's life and academic fields; readers must open the book themselves to appreciate the specific contents, and should not expect too much in the way of plot.

Who it's for

A good fit for

Readers interested in Republican-era scholars and literati writing
Beginners who want a light textual entry into Teng Gu's world
Readers studying the intersection of modern literature and art history

Not a good fit for

Readers who prefer strong storytelling and popular narrative
Specialist researchers seeking systematic academic treatises

Reading tips

First learn about Teng Gu's life and academic fields, then read the text, noting the interweaving of literature and scholarship.
The book is short; read it in two or three sittings, pausing to savor each section.
Read alongside nostalgic works by writers of the same period and compare their modes of emotional expression.

版权信息
一
二
三

FAQ

What kind of author is Teng Gu?

Teng Gu (1901–1941), courtesy name Ruoqu, was a native of Yuepu Town, Baoshan, Shanghai. He made pioneering achievements in many fields, including poetics, art aesthetics, cultural studies, painting history, literary criticism, art archaeology, and scholarly translation, and was a rare cross-disciplinary scholar of the Republican era.

What background knowledge is needed to read this book?

None is strictly required, but familiarity with the cultural context of the Republican era and with Teng Gu's multiple academic identities will make it easier to appreciate the interweaving of literary sensibility and scholarly judgment in the text. General readers can enter directly through the writing itself.

Comments

Find this book

This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.

About the author

滕固 Author

Teng Gu is an author who left a distinctive mark on modern Chinese art history and literary writing. Public information about him is limited, and his dates of birth and death, nationality, and educational background remain to be verified. Nine of his works are held in the collection, falling roughly into two groups. The first consists of studies in art history, such as A Brief History of Chinese Art and related writings in the Republican-era art history and theory academic library, showing his systematic survey of the development of Chinese art. The second is literary creation, including The Maze, Mural, Nostalgia, Watery Eyes, The Resurrection of the Stone Statue, and Centipede; these works are mostly essays and fiction, written in a delicate style with a clearly personal voice. His writings are classified under design, classic works, and essays and miscellaneous writings, indicating that his work spans both scholarship and literature and offers a valuable textual sample of Republican-era art history and literary writing.