A History of China's Case Precedent System
Tags
Summary
This book provides a detailed introduction to the case practices and characteristics of various stages in China from the Qin and Han dynasties to modern times. It aims to teach students well about China's excellent traditional legal culture, encourage more students to understand and become familiar with Chinese rule-of-law civilization, and build confidence in Chinese rule-of-law culture; at the same time, it provides reference for legal educators, researchers, and enthusiasts.
Editor's review
Who it's for
A good fit for
- Law students who need to understand the historical context of the Chinese case system
- Researchers and teaching personnel in legal history and judicial systems
- Advanced readers interested in the Chinese legal tradition and traditional legal culture
- Judges, prosecutors, and other practitioners who want to understand the function of cases from history
Not a good fit for
- Beginners without legal background who only want popular historical stories
- Practitioners expecting an operational guide to case law in the comparative law sense
- Researchers needing deep chronological monographs rather than a general historical survey
Reading tips
- Read the introduction or preface first to clarify the scope of what "cases" refers to in each era, then move to specific chapters to avoid conceptual confusion.
- Make a simple table along the timeline of Qin-Han, Tang-Song, Ming-Qing, and modern times, recording the characteristics and institutional position of case practices at each stage.
- After each stage, review the overall background of the legal system and judiciary of that period, and understand cases within the institutional environment.
- Read alongside a textbook on Chinese legal history; when encountering unfamiliar institutions, check the textbook first, then return to this book for case clues.
About the publisher
China Legal Publishing House is a legal publisher overseen and sponsored by the Ministry of Justice, with the publication of standard texts of national laws and regulations as an important focus; its catalogue already contains 2,972 titles. Its publications cover fields such as criminal law, civil law, contract law, company law, real estate law and the security system, including article-by-article commentaries such as the Interpretation of the Contract Part of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China, adjudication rules and case compilations oriented toward judicial practice such as Understanding and Applying Adjudication Rules in Contract Disputes and A Compendium of Court Views on Real Estate Cases, as well as legal classics such as On Crimes and Punishments and academic works such as The Theory of Procedural Sanctions. In terms of author resources, the publisher brings together classic legal authors such as Cesare Beccaria, scholars and practitioners such as Liu Junhai, Long Weiqiu and Zhu Shuying, and cooperates with institutions including the National Judges College and the Judicial Case Research Institute of the Supreme People's Court. Its publishing character lies in linking legal texts, scholarly interpretation and judicial application, balancing authoritative norms with practical guidance.
Contents
- 版权信息
- 《中国判例制度史》编写组
- 序言
- 前言
- 绪论
- 一、判例的历史传统
- 二、援引判例说理
- 三、判例的价值取向
- 四、判例文化传统的价值
- 第一章 秦汉判例
- 一、秦汉判例概况
- 二、秦汉判例的实践
- 三、秦汉判例的特点
- 第二章 魏晋南北朝判例
- 一、魏晋南北朝判例概况
- 二、魏晋南北朝判例的实践
- 三、魏晋南北朝判例的特点
- 第三章 隋唐判例
- 一、隋唐判例概况
- 二、隋唐判例的实践
- 三、隋唐判例的特点
- 第四章 两宋判例
- 一、两宋判例概况
- 二、两宋判例的实践
- 三、两宋判例的特点
- 第五章 元代判例
- 一、元代判例概况
- 二、元代判例的实践
- 三、元代判例的特点
- 第六章 明代判例
- 一、明代判例概况
- 二、明代判例的实践
- 三、明代判例的特点
- 第七章 清代判例
- 一、清代判例概况
- 二、清代判例的实践
- 三、清代判例的特点
- 第八章 近代判例
- 一、近代判例概况
- 二、晚清及民国判例的实践
- 三、革命根据地判例的实践
- 四、近代判例的特点
FAQ
Is this book suitable for law undergraduates?
Does "cases" in the book equal case law in the common law system?
Do I need to read from beginning to end in order?
What reference value does it have for legal practitioners?
Comments
Find this book
This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.
About the author
Wang Shirong is an author in the field of law; publicly available information is limited, and no confirmed details about his life, nationality, or positions can be verified. Judging from the two works included in the database, A History of the Chinese Case Precedent System and A Study of the "Futian Model" of People's Mediation, his writing draws on both the historical and contemporary dimensions of China's legal system. The former traces the development of the case precedent system in China and is a specialized study in legal history, while the latter focuses on a practical case of grassroots people's mediation and has the character of empirical investigation and experience summary. One subject is ancient and the other modern, yet both center on judicial and dispute-resolution mechanisms, showing the author's dual concern with institutional evolution and grassroots governance. His writing is grounded in institutions and cases, emphasizing the organization of materials and practical analysis in a plain style. Because verifiable information is limited, his academic background, the full scope of his research, and the specific influence of his works await further information.
Wang Bintong is a Chinese author about whom limited public information is available. What can be confirmed is that his works focus on law and social culture, with two titles held in the collection. Among them, A History of the Chinese Case Law System traces the evolution of China's case system from a historical perspective and falls within the field of legal history. "The Fengqiao Experience" and the Fine Traditions of People's Justice is part of the Research Series on Grassroots Infrastructure Construction in Chinese National Governance and discusses grassroots social governance and the traditions of people's justice. One work looks back at the origins of institutions, while the other addresses contemporary grassroots governance practice, showing the author's sustained interest in legal institutional history and judicial traditions. His writing follows the threads of institutions and history and engages with legal and socio-cultural issues, offering useful reference for readers interested in these fields. Because biographical information is unavailable, this note is limited to a brief account of his works' themes.