The Ohio Journal of Science, Vol. XVI, No. 1, November 1915

VariousProject Gutenberg · United StatesDec 2019

Rating 1.5
Word count
75K words
Chapters
8

Tags

Other Natural SciencesEnglish Originals Science EnlightenmentScience JournalNature ObservationHistorical CompilationAcademic MonographAcademic StudyExperimental RecordsMagazine SelectionInterdisciplinary StudyAmerican Midwest

Summary

Project Gutenberg was the first provider of free electronic books, or eBooks. Michael Hart, founder of Project Gutenberg, invented eBooks in 1971 and his memory continues to inspire the creation of eBooks and related technologies today.The Ohio Journal of Science, Vol. XVI, No. 1, November 1915 by VariousAuthor: Various,Language: English, Class: Q: Science, Release Date: Apr 26, 2017

Editor's review

This is the November 1915 issue (Vol. XVI, No. 1) of The Ohio Journal of Science, released by Project Gutenberg as a public-domain electronic text. Its value lies in preserving the look of an early twentieth-century American local science society publication: papers, brief reports, and society business appear side by side, giving a direct sense of how the scientific community of the time set its agenda, wrote, and circulated knowledge. For historians of science and of journals, it is primary material for observing disciplinary formation and the workings of a local society; for general readers, it is a window onto scientific discourse a century ago. Readers should note that the period's disciplinary categories, terminology, and standards of evidence differ from today's, and contemporary conclusions should not be used to judge it simplistically. Reading by individual article is recommended, comparing topics of interest with current research—attending not only to conclusions but also to argumentation and period limitations.

Who it's for

A good fit for

Not a good fit for

Reading tips

  1. Skim the table of contents first and pick individual papers by interest rather than reading straight through by volume and issue.
  2. For each paper, look at the question and methods first, then compare with related research today to appreciate changes in disciplinary standards.
  3. Note historical terms or institutional names as you go and look them up, avoiding misreading them by modern meanings.
  4. The society business and brief reports can be browsed separately as material for journal history, to observe how the publication operated.

About the publisher

Project Gutenberg United States · Founded in 1971

Project Gutenberg is a digital publishing project focused on public-domain ebooks. Its publishing direction centers on classic literary works whose copyright has expired, covering genres such as poetry, drama, fiction, and epic. Representative books include Lyrical Ballads by Wordsworth and Coleridge, Proust's Du côté de chez Swann, Shakespeare's Macbeth and The Complete Works of William Shakespeare, Homer's The Iliad, Dante's La Divina Comèdia: Purgatòri, Cervantes's The History of Don Quixote, Volume 2, and Grahame's The Wind in the Willows. Its author resources consist mainly of classic Western writers such as Wordsworth, Proust, Shakespeare, Homer, Dante, Cervantes, Grahame, and Tolstoy. Its publishing feature is the provision of freely accessible ebooks in EPUB and Kindle formats; it is not a traditional publisher, and publicly available information is limited.

Contents

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

FAQ

What types of content does this document contain? It is one issue of a society journal published in November 1915, typically including research papers, scientific brief reports, and society business. The specific contents should be checked against the original table of contents; when reading, separate the academic papers from the business material—examine argumentation in the former and the operation of the journal and society in the latter.
Do century-old scientific papers still have reading value today? Their value lies mainly not in conclusions but at the historical level: one can see the period's sense of problems, choice of methods, writing conventions, and disciplinary categories. Comparing old papers with current research helps one understand how scientific knowledge evolves and trains the ability to recognize standards of evidence and period limitations.
How should non-specialist readers approach this journal? Start with the table of contents, choose the short piece whose title interests you most, read abstract-like passages to get the gist, then decide whether to read closely. Skip unfamiliar terminology at first and focus on the tone and structure of scientific writing a century ago; if you only want a sense of the historical atmosphere, browsing the society business section is also very direct.

This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.

About the author

Various Author

Various is not a real person but a collective attribution used in book cataloging and databases for works with multiple authors, commonly applied to anthologies, compilations, or publications with too many contributors to list individually. On this Chinese book site, this attribution covers as many as 3,387 titles, spanning encyclopedic entries, historical documents, and trial records. Representative works include several volumes of the 11th edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica and the record of the trial of the major war criminals before the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg. Available public information is limited: nationality, birth and death dates, and common categories are not clearly recorded, making it difficult to summarize a unified writing style or personal biography. Readers should understand it as a cataloging convention rather than a single author.