Lippincott's Magazine of Popular Literature and Science, Volume 12, No. 28,
VariousProject Gutenberg · United StatesDec 2019
Rating 3.2- Word count
- 419K words
- Chapters
- 42
Tags
Other Popular Science Science EnlightenmentHumanistic CareWestern ThoughtIllustrated GuideMagazine SelectionPopular Narrative19th CenturyEclectic ReadingSocial ObservationVictorian EraSummary
Project Gutenberg was the first provider of free electronic books, or eBooks. Michael Hart, founder of Project Gutenberg, invented eBooks in 1971 and his memory continues to inspire the creation of eBooks and related technologies today.Lippincott's Magazine of Popular Literature and Science, Volume 12, No. 28,Author: Various,Language: English, Class: AP: General Works: Periodicals, Release Date: Jan 14, 2005Editor's review
This book is a Project Gutenberg electronic edition of the nineteenth-century English periodical Lippincott's Magazine of Popular Literature and Science, Volume 12, No. 28, a general-interest periodical. Its value lies not in any single famous piece but in showing the editorial form of the era, in which popular literature and science writing appeared side by side: fiction and nonfiction, reviews and informational sketches shared the same issue, allowing readers to observe how the nineteenth-century English-speaking world conveyed literary taste and new scientific knowledge to ordinary readers. As historical material it suits periodical studies, reading history, or the cultural context of the Victorian era; as reading material it is closer to browsable primary documents than to continuous narrative. Because it is a whole issue, topics jump between pieces, so selective reading with questions in mind is recommended. The original English and period vocabulary create some difficulty, but the Gutenberg edition is easy to search and excerpt, making it suitable for note-taking and comparative reading.Who it's for
A good fit for
- Students and scholars studying nineteenth-century English-language periodicals and reading culture
- Readers interested in Victorian popular literature and science writing
- Researchers needing original English periodical material for textual analysis
- English readers who enjoy browsing old periodicals and jumping between pieces by interest
Not a good fit for
- Readers hoping for a complete novel or a single-topic monograph
- Beginners with weak English who need modern annotations
- Readers seeking systematic contemporary popular science
Reading tips
- Skim the table of contents and columns first, then read one literary and one scientific piece to sense the structure.
- Keep a notebook to record period vocabulary, advertisement-style phrasing, and editorial tone as historical excerpts.
- There is no need to read in order; group selections by theme and compare with other periodicals of the same period.
- Skip unfamiliar allusions first and check the background after finishing a piece to keep the reading rhythm.
About the publisher
Project Gutenberg United States · Founded in 1971Project Gutenberg is a digital publishing project focused on public-domain ebooks. Its publishing direction centers on classic literary works whose copyright has expired, covering genres such as poetry, drama, fiction, and epic. Representative books include Lyrical Ballads by Wordsworth and Coleridge, Proust's Du côté de chez Swann, Shakespeare's Macbeth and The Complete Works of William Shakespeare, Homer's The Iliad, Dante's La Divina Comèdia: Purgatòri, Cervantes's The History of Don Quixote, Volume 2, and Grahame's The Wind in the Willows. Its author resources consist mainly of classic Western writers such as Wordsworth, Proust, Shakespeare, Homer, Dante, Cervantes, Grahame, and Tolstoy. Its publishing feature is the provision of freely accessible ebooks in EPUB and Kindle formats; it is not a traditional publisher, and publicly available information is limited.
Contents
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
FAQ
Is this periodical a complete issue or an anthology?
This is the complete content of Volume 12, No. 28 of the periodical, prepared as electronic text by Project Gutenberg; it is not a later selected anthology. The composition of pieces and column arrangement therefore preserve the original issue's appearance, suitable for observing the editorial structure of a whole issue.How difficult is the English, and what background is needed?
The text is nineteenth-century English, with period features in syntax and vocabulary, and some scientific statements are outdated. University-level English reading ability is enough to attempt it, but keep reference works or an electronic dictionary at hand and do not insist on understanding every word.Is it suitable for reading from beginning to end?
Not very. The pieces have independent topics and mixed genres, and continuous reading easily becomes tiring. A more effective approach is to read by column or topic, browse with research questions, and take notes.This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.
About the author
Various AuthorVarious is not a real person but a collective attribution used in book cataloging and databases for works with multiple authors, commonly applied to anthologies, compilations, or publications with too many contributors to list individually. On this Chinese book site, this attribution covers as many as 3,387 titles, spanning encyclopedic entries, historical documents, and trial records. Representative works include several volumes of the 11th edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica and the record of the trial of the major war criminals before the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg. Available public information is limited: nationality, birth and death dates, and common categories are not clearly recorded, making it difficult to summarize a unified writing style or personal biography. Readers should understand it as a cataloging convention rather than a single author.