Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, No. 699
VariousProject Gutenberg · United StatesDec 2019
Rating 2.7- Word count
- 101K words
- Chapters
- 11
Tags
Other Popular Science Arts and SciencesSocial ObservationScience EnlightenmentMagazine SelectionPopular NarrativeCultural ChangeSummary
Project Gutenberg was the first provider of free electronic books, or eBooks. Michael Hart, founder of Project Gutenberg, invented eBooks in 1971 and his memory continues to inspire the creation of eBooks and related technologies today.Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, No. 699 by VariousAuthor: Various,Language: English, Class: AP: General Works: Periodicals, Release Date: Oct 29, 2014Editor's review
This is a public-domain electronic reproduction of No. 699 of Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, which belongs to the same journal sequence as No. 697 and presents the typical appearance of a 19th-century general-interest popular periodical. Its reading value centers on the "periodical ecosystem" rather than any single famous piece: literature, science, and art topics stand side by side, and the columns form a kind of knowledge platter that lets one see the rhythm and taste of Victorian popular reading. For researchers in periodical history, the history of popular science, or English prose, this is a concrete and light sample that can be placed alongside other issues of the same journal to observe the continuation of topics and changes in editorial arrangement. Because it is a single issue lacking a modern introduction, it is advisable to read selectively with questions in mind rather than seek a coherent narrative. Suitable as course supplementary material, a corpus sample, or casual browsing; read one or two pieces in fragmented time to get a feel for the tone and information organization of an old periodical.Who it's for
A good fit for
- Readers studying 19th-century English periodicals and the history of popular reading
- Those interested in Victorian popular science and literary-artistic prose
- Learners who need public-domain English corpora for extensive reading or style analysis
- Enthusiasts who like the original look of old periodicals and are willing to read by piece
Not a good fit for
- Readers expecting a complete monograph or a continuous long narrative
- English beginners who need modern translation and detailed annotations
- Ordinary readers who prefer contemporary topics and concise style
Reading tips
- First look at the distribution of columns, choose two or three pieces of interest, and no need to read straight through from beginning to end.
- While reading, mark article types and topics, and accumulate common 19th-century English expressions and sentence patterns.
- Compare with No. 697 or other issues to observe the continuation of topics and differences in arrangement within the same journal.
- If used for research, keep simple notes on pieces, recording themes, rhetoric, and sources of knowledge.
About the publisher
Project Gutenberg United States · Founded in 1971Project Gutenberg is a digital publishing project focused on public-domain ebooks. Its publishing direction centers on classic literary works whose copyright has expired, covering genres such as poetry, drama, fiction, and epic. Representative books include Lyrical Ballads by Wordsworth and Coleridge, Proust's Du côté de chez Swann, Shakespeare's Macbeth and The Complete Works of William Shakespeare, Homer's The Iliad, Dante's La Divina Comèdia: Purgatòri, Cervantes's The History of Don Quixote, Volume 2, and Grahame's The Wind in the Willows. Its author resources consist mainly of classic Western writers such as Wordsworth, Proust, Shakespeare, Homer, Dante, Cervantes, Grahame, and Tolstoy. Its publishing feature is the provision of freely accessible ebooks in EPUB and Kindle formats; it is not a traditional publisher, and publicly available information is limited.
Contents
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
FAQ
Do the contents of No. 699 and No. 697 overlap?
The two are different issues of the same journal, with specific pieces arranged according to their respective issues. The materials do not provide a list of pieces, so it cannot be confirmed whether any articles are repeated; when reading, check the table of contents of each issue separately, then decide whether to read them in comparison.Is the source of this e-book reliable?
It comes from Project Gutenberg and is a reproduction of a public-domain e-book released by that platform. Project Gutenberg is known for providing free e-books; the text is in the public domain and suitable for reading and research, but it does not include annotations or introductions from modern publishers.Without an introduction, how can I read it efficiently?
It is advisable to first browse the columns and article titles, and read selectively by topic; when encountering historical background or scientific terms, look them up as you go, and note article types and main points. If doing research, categorize notes under "literature, science, art" to facilitate later comparison.This site is an index: you start “Search all sources” in your browser, and the entries it lists all point to third-party sites; please judge their availability yourself.
About the author
Various AuthorVarious is not a real person but a collective attribution used in book cataloging and databases for works with multiple authors, commonly applied to anthologies, compilations, or publications with too many contributors to list individually. On this Chinese book site, this attribution covers as many as 3,387 titles, spanning encyclopedic entries, historical documents, and trial records. Representative works include several volumes of the 11th edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica and the record of the trial of the major war criminals before the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg. Available public information is limited: nationality, birth and death dates, and common categories are not clearly recorded, making it difficult to summarize a unified writing style or personal biography. Readers should understand it as a cataloging convention rather than a single author.